Ad Raters: Part 2
Start Timer
0:00:00
Let’s say we use people to rate ads.
There are two types of raters. Random and independent from our point of view:
- 80% of raters are careful and they rate an ad as good (60% chance) or bad (40% chance).
- 20% of raters are lazy and they rate every ad as good (100% chance).
- Suppose a rater rates just three ads, and rates them all as good. What’s the probability the rater was lazy?
2. Suppose a rater sees ads and rates all of them as good. What happens to the probability the rater was lazy as tends to infinity?
3. Suppose we want to exclude lazy raters. Can you devise a rule to classify raters as careful or lazy for a given significance level ?
Recommended questions for you
Personalized based on your user activity, skill level, and preferences.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Comments