SQL (Structured Query Language) is one of the most important querying languages today for accessing and manipulating relational databases.
One common task in SQL involves joining tables to combine related information. The LEFT JOIN operation is a widely known technique to retrieve relevant information from multiple tables.
In this article, we’ll explore a common use case in database management– how to use LEFT JOIN to merge multiple rows into one.
Before diving into a specific example, let’s go over how LEFT JOIN works.
In SQL, the LEFT JOIN
(or LEFT OUTER JOIN
) keyword allows you to retrieve records from two tables. It fetches all the rows from the left table and the matching rows from the right table.
If there’s no match, the result will be NULL for every column of the right table. This JOIN function should be used when you want to combine rows from two tables and show all the records from the “primary” table, even if there are no matching records in the “related” table.
Let’s consider two tables, Students
and Enrollments
.
Students
table
StudentID | StudentName |
---|---|
1 | Alice |
2 | Bob |
3 | Charlie |
Enrollments
table
EnrollmentID | StudentID | Course |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Mathematics |
2 | 3 | English |
To fetch a list of students and their enrolled courses (if any), we can use:
SELECT Students.StudentName, Enrollments.Course
FROM Students
LEFT JOIN Enrollments ON Students.StudentID = Enrollments.StudentID;
Our result should look something like this:
StudentName | Course |
---|---|
Alice | Mathematics |
Bob | NULL |
Charlie | English |
Notice that “Bob” appears in the result set with a NULL value, indicating that he isn’t enrolled in any course.
Combining multiple rows of a table, especially using LEFT JOIN
and/or aggregation functions, is required in various real-world scenarios. Common industry use cases include:
An important caveat is that a combined string might become more challenging to parse, especially when dealing with extensive or lengthy data. Always evaluate the specific needs and constraints of your application or analysis before deciding on the best approach.
GROUP_CONCAT
is an aggregation function in MySQL that concatenates values from multiple rows into a single string. When used with LEFT JOIN
, it combines two relational tables and summarizes the essential information in a list.
Let’s illustrate this function using an example.
Say that an e-commerce company is interested in customer purchasing patterns. They want to analyze order data to understand how consumers typically group products and better identify which items will likely be bought together in the future.
Orders
table
OrderID | OrderDate |
---|---|
1 | 2023-09-13 |
2 | 2023-09-11 |
3 | 2023-09-15 |
OrderItems
table
ItemID | OrderID | ProductName | Quantity |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Laptop | 2 |
2 | 1 | Mouse | 1 |
3 | 2 | Keyboard | 1 |
4 | 3 | Monitor | 1 |
5 | 3 | Laptop | 1 |
For the view they require, they would need to join Orders
and OrderIDs
and concatenate the items for each OrderID.
The solution should look like this:
SELECT
Orders.OrderID,
Orders.OrderDate,
GROUP_CONCAT(CONCAT(OrderItems.ProductName, ' (x', OrderItems.Quantity, ')') ORDER BY OrderItems.ProductName ASC) AS ItemsOrdered
FROM Orders
LEFT JOIN OrderItems ON Orders.OrderID = OrderItems.OrderID
GROUP BY Orders.OrderID, Orders.OrderDate;
SELECT
OrderID,
GROUP_CONCAT(CONCAT(ProductName, ' (x', Quantity, ')') ORDER BY ProductName ASC) AS OrderedProducts
FROM OrderItems
GROUP BY OrderID;
The resulting table should contain a summarised view of the orders. Note that the CONCAT function combines the ProductName, Quantity, and the string literals ‘(x’ and ‘)’. The outer function, GROUP_CONCAT
, aggregates these concatenated strings for all of the products related to an order, producing a list.
Expected output:
OrderID | OrderDate | ItemsOrdered |
---|---|---|
1 | 2023-09-13 | Laptop (x2), Mouse (x1) |
2 | 2023-09-11 | Keyboard (x1) |
3 | 2023-09-15 | Laptop (x1), Monitor (x1) |
STRING_AGG
is a function used in SQL Server to concatenate the values of multiple rows into a single string. Essentially, it’s SQL Server’s answer to MySQL’s GROUP_CONCAT
function.
The STRING_AGG
function syntax consists of:
STRING_AGG ( expression, separator ) [ <order_clause> ]
where the following convention is followed:
expression
: The column or expression whose values you want to concatenate.separator
: The string value that will be used to separate concatenated results.<order_clause>
(Optional): Defines the order in which to concatenate the values. It’s typically used in the format WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY <order_expression>)
.Let’s try this out using an example.
A web services company wants to analyze user activity logs to analyze which activities are performed together most frequently at a user level. You’re given two tables with user information and their activities.
Users
table
UserID | UserName | |
---|---|---|
1 | Alice | mailto:alice@email.com |
2 | Bob | mailto:bob@email.com |
3 | Charlie | mailto:charlie@email.com |
UserLogs
table
LogID | UserID | LogEntry | LogDate |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Logged in | 2023-09-12 08:10:00 |
2 | 1 | Changed password | 2023-09-12 08:20:00 |
3 | 2 | Logged in | 2023-09-12 09:15:00 |
4 | 3 | Logged in | 2023-09-12 10:00:00 |
5 | 3 | Downloaded report | 2023-09-12 10:05:00 |
To do this, we need to join Users
with UserLogs
based on UserID and concatenate the logs against each UserName
.
As such, our solution should look something like this:
SELECT
u.UserName,
u.Email,
STRING_AGG(CONCAT(FORMAT(l.LogDate, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss'), ': ', l.LogEntry), '; ')
WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY l.LogDate) AS UserActivities
FROM Users u
LEFT JOIN UserLogs l ON u.UserID = l.UserID
GROUP BY u.UserName, u.Email;
Expected output table:
UserName | UserActivities | |
---|---|---|
Alice | alice@email.com | 2023-09-12 08:10:00: Logged in; 2023-09-12 08:20:00: Changed password |
Bob | bob@email.com | 2023-09-12 09:15:00: Logged in |
Charlie | charlie@email.com | 2023-09-12 10:00:00: Logged in; 2023-09-12 10:05:00: Downloaded report |
In other DBMSs, this same technique can be employed using slightly different syntax.
PostgreSQL uses the STRING_AGG
function, the same as SQL Server. However, the syntax varies slightly across these systems. While MySQL uses an ORDER BY
clause within GROUP_CONCAT
, SQL Server’s STRING_AGG
uses WITHIN GROUP
for ordering.
In Oracle, LISTAGG
is the aggregation function used for concatenating values from multiple rows into a single string.
In different DBMSs, each string aggregation function has its own set of nuances and caveats. We’ll look at some of the main functions in-depth:
GROUP_CONCAT
group_concat_max_len
system variable, which has a default value of 1024 characters. This can lead to truncated results if not set properly.ORDER BY
clause is explicitly provided.DISTINCT
keyword.NULL
, it’s automatically skipped.STRING_AGG
NULL
, it’s automatically skipped.GROUP_CONCAT
, the order of concatenation isn’t guaranteed unless specified.STRING_AGG
STRING_AGG
is available only from SQL Server 2017 onwards.WITHIN GROUP
clause.STRING_AGG
will skip NULL
values.LISTAGG
VARCHAR2
, NVARCHAR2
, or RAW
column. This can lead to an error message.LISTAGG
doesn’t handle duplicates. You might need to use the DISTINCT
keyword to exclude them.LISTAGG
will exclude NULL
values during concatenation.ON OVERFLOW
clause was introduced to handle situations when the resulting string exceeds the length limit. You can use ON OVERFLOW TRUNCATE
to manage these instances.When using any of these functions, understanding their nuances is crucial. Proper precautions, like setting the right configurations or being aware of version limitations, can prevent unexpected errors in your SQL operations.
The FOR XML
technique in SQL Server is a method to format query results as XML. This technique is often used when a traditional rowset structure doesn’t suffice.
Let’s try this out using our user activity example from above.
Users
table
UserID | UserName | |
---|---|---|
1 | Alice | alice@email.com |
2 | Bob | bob@email.com |
3 | Charlie | charlie@email.com |
UserLogs
table
LogID | UserID | LogEntry | LogDate |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Logged in | 2023-09-12 08:10:00 |
2 | 1 | Changed password | 2023-09-12 08:20:00 |
3 | 2 | Logged in | 2023-09-12 09:15:00 |
4 | 3 | Logged in | 2023-09-12 10:00:00 |
5 | 3 | Downloaded report | 2023-09-12 10:05:00 |
The objective in this example remains the same– to join Users
with UserLogs
based on UserID, and concatenate the logs against each UserName
.
Using the FOR XML subquery method, our code should look like this:
SELECT
u.UserID,
u.UserName,
STUFF(
(
SELECT ';' + LogEntry
FROM UserLogs ul
WHERE ul.UserID = u.UserID
FOR XML PATH('')
), 1, 1, ''
) AS Activities
FROM Users u;
Note the use of the STUFF function, which removes the trailing delimiter ‘;’ from the end of the aggregated string.
Our expected output table now looks like:
UserID | UserName | Activities |
---|---|---|
1 | Alice | Logged In;Opened App;Logged Out |
2 | Bob | Logged In;Closed App |
3 | Charlie | Logged In;DownloadedReport |
FOR XML Caveats:
FOR XML
method are XML-escaped. For example, special characters like <
, >
, and &
would be encoded as <
, >
, and &
respectively. If your data contains these characters and you don’t want them XML-escaped, additional string manipulation functions will be needed.STUFF
function to remove the first character of the concatenated string.FOR XML PATH
provides a way to aggregate strings, it’s not always the most efficient method, especially for large datasets. It’s essential to evaluate performance, especially if more efficient built-in string aggregation functions are available in newer versions of the DBMS.This article has explored varying techniques to combine multiple rows across different database systems, including MySQL’s GROUP_CONCAT
, SQL Server’s FOR XML PATH('')
, STRING_AGG
, and Oracle’s LISTAGG
. Each method serves the same fundamental purpose but carries its own nuances and caveats.
Mastering these techniques will increase the efficiency of your data analysis and enhance your data presentation skills. Whether you’re a seasoned SQL expert or a budding enthusiast, combining rows is a game-changer, underscoring the vast possibilities that SQL offers for data manipulation and presentation.